TLDR: DHS has published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) that would significantly reshape the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program. The proposal implements the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022 and introduces far more aggressive oversight: more than 1,000 annual site visits, background screening and biometrics for roughly 2,488 individuals tied to Regional Centers, expanded enforcement powers (including penalties up to 10% of invested capital), and the elimination of several older job-creation methodologies. Investment thresholds stay the same ($1.05 million standard, $800,000 for Targeted Employment Areas (TEAs) or infrastructure projects) but how projects qualify, and how closely they’ll be watched, is changing. If you’re an investor, Regional Center principal, or project sponsor, this is worth understanding before you commit capital or file a petition.
Why This Rule Exists
The EB-5 program has always offered a straightforward value proposition: invest in a U.S. business that creates jobs, and earn a path to a green card. But for years, regulators and lawmakers raised concerns that parts of the industry lacked adequate oversight, leaving room for fraud, misused investor funds, and job-creation claims that didn’t always hold up.
Congress responded with the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act (RIA) of 2022. DHS’s newly published NPRM is the agency’s attempt to translate that law into enforceable regulation. The result is a proposal that treats EB-5 less like a loosely supervised immigration pathway and more like a regulated investment vehicle, with real accountability for the people and entities managing investor capital.
If that sounds like a lot to process, you’re not wrong. Immigration law changes constantly, and EB-5 is one of the more complex corners of it. That’s exactly why it helps to have someone tracking these developments for you.
What’s Actually Changing
A Much More Aggressive Oversight Regime
The centerpiece of this proposal is compliance, and lots of it. DHS plans to conduct more than 1,000 site visits and virtual compliance checks annually, along with recurring audits of Regional Centers. Regional Centers will need formal systems for monitoring capital deployment and job creation, plus expanded recordkeeping and reporting obligations.
This isn’t cheap. DHS estimates compliance staffing alone will cost the agency roughly $44.8 million per year, and industry-wide compliance costs could run between $39 million and $85 million annually. For Regional Centers, more than 87% of which are classified as small businesses, that’s a meaningful operational shift. Compliance infrastructure is moving from “nice to have” to “core function.”
Individual Decision-Makers Are Now on the Radar
Historically, EB-5 scrutiny focused on entities: Regional Centers, New Commercial Enterprises (NCEs), Job-Creating Entities (JCEs). This proposal changes that by adding biometrics collection and background screening for approximately 2,488 individuals; managing partners, owners, officers, and anyone else with real authority over EB-5 operations or investor funds.
In plain terms: compliance is no longer just an operational checkbox. It’s a personal responsibility for the people running these projects. DHS estimates this vetting process will cost about $910,000 annually, but the bigger impact is the added visibility into who’s actually calling the shots.
Stronger Tools to Fight Fraud
DHS is arming itself with a broader enforcement toolkit, including the ability to suspend or terminate Regional Centers, debar individuals and entities, deny or revoke petitions, and impose monetary penalties of up to 10% of invested capital. The agency has been explicit that these measures are meant to give it “actionable tools” against misconduct and to make noncompliance genuinely costly.
For sponsors, principals, and affiliated entities, this raises the stakes considerably. Weak internal controls or mismanaged funds could now trigger serious regulatory consequences, not just reputational ones.
Some Job-Creation Methods Are Going Away
The proposal also eliminates several older methodologies for counting job creation, including troubled business provisions, job-sharing methodologies, and certain visitor-spending approaches. DHS considers these outdated and rarely used, but for projects built around them the impact could be significant.
Investors still need to show that each investment supports the creation of at least 10 full-time jobs, but DHS is tightening how that job creation gets measured and documented. Expect more scrutiny on economic models and supporting evidence, and expect some Regional Centers to revise business plans and analyses to keep pace.
Investment Minimums Stay, But Priorities Shift
The core investment framework from the RIA remains intact:
- $1.05 million standard minimum investment
- $800,000 minimum for TEA or infrastructure projects
- 20% of annual visas reserved for rural projects
- 10% reserved for high-unemployment projects
- 2% reserved for infrastructure projects
- Inflation adjustments starting in 2027, and every five years after
DHS is also proposing new investor protections, including priority-date retention mechanisms that help preserve immigration benefits if a Regional Center is terminated for reasons outside an investor’s control, a change DHS estimates will provide about $3.7 million in annualized benefit to investors.
One area to watch: DHS wants to tighten how high-unemployment TEAs are calculated, requiring a closer link between a project’s location and the qualifying census tract. That could make it harder for some projects to use creative geographic configurations to reach TEA status, while rewarding projects that qualify for rural and targeted-area preferences on more straightforward terms.
What This Means for You
If you’re an investor, this proposal is a reminder that where and how you invest matters more than ever. Projects with clean documentation, straightforward job-creation methodologies, and genuine ties to rural or high-unemployment areas are likely to be better positioned going forward.
If you’re a Regional Center principal or project sponsor, this is the moment to get ahead of compliance infrastructure rather than react to it later. Personal accountability, background screening, and audit readiness aren’t hypothetical anymore, they’re the proposed baseline.
Either way, this is not a rule you want to interpret on your own. The details matter, and the stakes are real.
A New Era for EB-5 Oversight
DHS’s proposed rule signals a permanent shift in how the federal government views EB-5, from a relatively hands-off investment pathway to a closely regulated one. The investment amounts haven’t changed, but nearly everything around them has: oversight, accountability, enforcement, and the methodologies projects can rely on to qualify.
Whether you’re evaluating a new cross-border investment or already have a petition in progress, our team is here to help you understand what this proposal means for your specific situation and how to move forward with confidence. Click here to book a consultation today.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Has this rule taken effect yet?
No. This is a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, which means DHS is proposing these changes and will accept public comment before any final rule is issued. Investors and Regional Centers should watch this process closely, but no new requirements are currently in effect under this proposal.
Q: Do the EB-5 investment minimums change under this proposal?
No. The $1.05 million standard minimum and $800,000 minimum for TEA and infrastructure projects remain the same, consistent with the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022.
Q: Who is affected by the new biometrics and background screening requirements?
The proposal targets individuals with substantive authority over EB-5 operations or investor funds including managing partners, owners, officers, and managers of Regional Centers, New Commercial Enterprises, and Job-Creating Entities. DHS estimates roughly 2,488 individuals would be affected.
Ready to have Berardi on your side?
Whether you’re a business looking to hire or a professional hoping to relocate, immigration law can be complicated. But you don’t have to do it alone. Put our experience to work for you.