TLDR:
- DHS has signaled, through its federal regulatory agenda, that it’s considering a more formal educational framework for naturalization applicants, along with the possibility of allowing approved third parties to administer parts of the citizenship test.
- No rule has been proposed or published yet, this is only a stated intent to develop one, expected as a proposed rule later this year.
- Nothing about the current N-400 process has changed. Applicants still prepare for the same English and civics tests that exist today.
- Immigration practitioners are watching closely because this fits a broader pattern of DHS tightening naturalization requirements, but the specifics remain unknown until DHS publishes actual rule text.
Why This Is on Practitioners’ Radar
If you’re working toward U.S. citizenship, or helping a family member get there, any headline about the citizenship test changing can be unsettling. It’s natural to wonder whether the goalposts are about to move, and whether the studying you’ve already done, or the plan you’ve already built, still holds up.
Here’s the reassuring part: right now, nothing has actually changed. What’s happened is that DHS included a new item on its regulatory agenda which is essentially a public list of rules the agency intends to work on. That’s a meaningful signal of direction, but it is not a new law or regulation. There’s an important difference between an agency saying “we’re thinking about this” and an agency actually requiring it, and this news falls firmly in the first category.
Still, it’s worth understanding what’s being proposed. These updates point to where naturalization policy could be heading, and getting ahead of these conversations is exactly the kind of thing that makes the process feel less overwhelming.
What DHS Is Actually Proposing
A Formal Citizenship Education Framework
Today, naturalization applicants prepare primarily for two things: the English test and the civics test. There isn’t a broader, formalized “educational standard” applicants must meet beyond passing those two components.
DHS’s regulatory agenda suggests that could change. The agency has said it wants to amend the regulations governing educational requirements for naturalization and establish a clearer framework for how applicants demonstrate they meet those standards. In DHS’s own words, the goal is to create “a framework and a standard” for citizenship education, though the agenda entry doesn’t yet spell out what that framework would actually require.
Possible Third-Party Administration of the Test
The second piece involves how the test is given, not just what’s on it. USCIS is exploring whether approved organizations outside the government could be authorized to administer parts of the naturalization exam, rather than having every step handled directly by USCIS officers. DHS has framed this as a way to add flexibility to how exams are conducted, though (again) the agenda doesn’t identify who those approved third parties might be or how such a system would function.
Strengthening Test “Integrity”
Both pieces are tied together under a stated goal of strengthening the integrity of the naturalization test. DHS has connected this effort to broader themes around civics knowledge, applicant scrutiny, and promoting assimilation and a shared understanding of U.S. government and history among new citizens.
What Hasn’t Changed
It’s worth being direct about this, because it’s the most important takeaway for anyone currently in the naturalization process:
- No new citizenship education requirement is in effect.
- No new testing requirement is in effect.
- DHS has not published the actual proposed rule text, only a summary of its intent.
- The current English and civics testing process continues exactly as it has been.
A regulatory agenda entry is a statement of intent, not a rule. Before anything here becomes binding, DHS would need to publish a formal Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, allow for public comment, review that feedback, and then finalize a rule. That process typically takes time, and it’s not guaranteed that the final version (if one is issued at all) will match today’s early description.
Who This Could Eventually Affect
If DHS does move forward, the applicants most likely to feel the impact are those filing Form N-400 in the future, once any new rule is finalized. That could include:
- Individuals preparing to apply for naturalization, who may eventually need to satisfy a more defined educational standard beyond today’s English and civics tests.
- Applicants who rely on community-based or nonprofit test-prep resources, since a third-party testing structure could reshape how and where parts of the exam are administered.
- Families planning naturalization timelines, who may want to factor potential future changes into their overall planning, without assuming the current process will look different anytime soon.
For now, this is a “watch and wait” situation rather than a “change what you’re doing” one.
What You Should Do Next
If you’re currently preparing for the English and civics tests, keep preparing exactly as you have been. The requirements you’re studying for today are the requirements that apply to your case. There is no indication that anyone currently in the pipeline needs to change course.
That said, it’s a good moment to stay informed rather than tune out. Once DHS publishes a proposed rule, there will typically be a public comment period. This period is a chance for advocacy groups, legal practitioners, and the public to weigh in before anything is finalized. Understanding where things stand, and what to expect if a rule is eventually adopted, can make the eventual transition (if there is one) far less stressful.
This is also a good example of why it helps to have someone tracking these developments on your behalf. Immigration policy shifts often start exactly like this, as a quiet line item in a regulatory agenda, long before they become something applicants need to actively respond to.
Where This Leaves Naturalization Applicants
DHS has opened the door to a more formal citizenship education framework and a possible third-party testing structure, but the door is only open. Nothing has walked through it yet. No new requirements apply to today’s applicants, and the current N-400 process, including the English and civics tests, remains exactly as it is.
Immigration rules can shift in ways that are hard to track on your own, especially when they start as agency intentions rather than finished regulations. Nobody should navigate immigration alone, and that includes staying ahead of changes before they arrive. If you have questions about where your naturalization case stands or how to plan around developments like this one, Berardi Immigration Law is here to help you make sense of it. Click here to book your consultation today.
FAQs
Q: Do I need to prepare differently for my citizenship test right now?
No. The current English and civics testing process is still what applies to N-400 applicants today. DHS has only signaled that it may propose changes in the future; no new educational or testing requirement has taken effect.
Q: When will DHS’s proposed rule be published?
DHS has not yet released the actual rule text. The regulatory agenda indicates the agency intends to move forward with a proposal, but the timeline for publication, along with the public comment period that would follow, hasn’t been finalized as of this writing.
Q: What would happen if this rule is finalized?
It’s too early to say with certainty, since DHS hasn’t published specifics. In general, a finalized rule of this kind would likely apply going forward rather than retroactively, and would follow a public comment period before taking effect. Anyone with an active or upcoming naturalization case should keep an eye on official USCIS updates, or work with an immigration attorney who is tracking the rule’s progress.
Ready to have Berardi on your side?
Whether you’re a business looking to hire or a professional hoping to relocate, immigration law can be complicated. But you don’t have to do it alone. Put our experience to work for you.





